National Security Criminal Defense Center (NSCDC)
The Issue
Muslim political and religious speech rights have been seriously infringed upon since 9/11. Muslim speech is unfairly viewed and charged under true threats statutes (i.e., 18. U.S.C. 875(c), 18 U.S.C. 115(a)(1)(B) etc.), largely as a result of discriminatory and biased investigative practices.
In addition, several criminal statutes exist to prosecute the provision of material support to foreign terrorist organizations. 18 U.S.C. 2339A, 2339B, 2339C, and 2339D. 18 U.S.C. 2339B prohibits any form of support to a designated foreign terrorist organization, including speech on behalf of the organization. The statute was immediately challenged on constitutional grounds and after successful challenges, amended. The amended version was ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1 (2010). The amended version of § 2339B prohibits all forms of speech “to, under the direction of, or in coordination with foreign groups that the speaker knows to be terrorist organizations.” Id. at 4. This can include activity like sharing contact information, posting news updates on behalf of the organization, and opening social media accounts for the organization. But, the statute does not restrict “independent advocacy, or indeed any activities not directed to, coordinated with, or controlled by foreign terrorist groups.” Id. at 5-6.
MLFA’s criminal defense department is committed to educating the public on the limitations of this statute and defending individuals charged under § 2339B based on their independent speech.
For the past 20 years, MLFA has provided criminal defense in conjunction with advice concerning compliance with 18 USC § 2339B. As the only organization to do so, it is a national leader in this subject, having represented more than 20 charities and more than 50 individuals charged with § 2339B offenses.
Cases
United States v. Khaled Miah
MLFA’s Criminal Defense Department represented Mr. Miah in his criminal jury trial in the Western District of Pennsylvania in December of 2021.
United States of America v. Georgianna A.M. Giampietro
A mother of two in Tennessee, who converted to Islam in 2014, initially supported ISIS but later distanced herself as their actions became more extreme.
Other Resources
United States v. Jason Fong
ALL MATERIAL SUPPORT CHARGES DISMISSED! Mr. Fong was 25 when he reverted to Islam in January 2020. After he reverted, he was targeted by FBI counterterrorism undercover online operatives who sought to persuade Mr. Fong to commit a crime.
Other Resources
United States v. Imad Eddin Wadi
Mr. Wadi faced a sentence of life in prison. At sentencing, MLFA’s Criminal Defense team highlighted the government’s entrapment of Mr. Wadi and showcased his character, dedication to his family and community service in San Antonio.
Other Resources
United States of America v. Armin Harcevic
Armin a Bosnian refugee built a successful contracting business in the US. In 2014, he learned a fellow Bosnian who went to his Mosque in St. Louis, Mr. Paraza, had traveled to Syria to fight against Bashar al-Assad in the early stages of the Syrian Civil War.
United States of America v. Mustafa Kamal
The U.S. Attorney’s office identified a Muslim community member who was suffering from mental health issues including manic and psychotic symptoms as a potential terrorist following statements he made online allegedly threatening a former president.
News & Commentary
United States v. Khaled Miah
- Upholding the First Amendment Rights
- MLFA argued Important First Amendment Case at Third Circuit Court of Appeals
United States v. Georgianna Giampietro
- https://mlfa.org/united-states-v-georgianna-giampietro/
- https://mlfa.org/cases/united-states-of-america-v-georgianna-a-m-giampietro/
United States v. Jason Fong
- A Revert’s Fight against Discriminatory Prosecution
- MLFA’s Landmark Dismissal: Challenging Material Support of Terrorism Charges
- I’m an American Muslim Targeted by the FBI. In Jason Fong’s Own Words. – MLFA
United States v. Imad Wadi
United States v. Armin Harcevic
- https://mlfa.org/cases/united-states-of-america-v-armin-harcevic/
- Lawyer who represented Bin Laden’s driver now helping defendant in St. Louis terrorism case – MLFA
- CLCMA Attorneys Will Argue Trial Court Had No Jurisdiction to Convict Defendant on Terrorism Charges for Supporting Free Syrian Army Fighter in Syrian Civil War – MLFA
United States v. Alexander Smith
Resources
- Political & Religious Speech– What you Need to Know
- Palestine–Free Speech and Material Support Charges
- Material Support – What You Need to Know About the Law
- Student Protests & Encampments: Identify the Bullies & Protect Your Movement
- Student Protests & Encampments: What to do when Facing the Bullies
- Speech Implications and What Speech is Not Protected
- MLFA Town Hall: Gaza Political Speech & Activities